The FLIR images are interesting and of some relative value but it is not clear if or how the camera was calibrated and if the automatic temperature scale displayed is accurate or not and therefore I would be careful about drawing any conclusions from it.
This is similar to the kinds of measurements I have been making on space borne instruments for over 30 years and it is not trivial to get good repeatable results (if you can't repeat to the same accuracy then the experiment needs refinement).
That written using a calibrated FLIR imager with a reference target in the scene with the camper, as an in-situ real time reference, would be helpful. The reference target could be as simple as a hot plate with a thermometer (consumer devices are not very accurate and vary device to device) or better a thermocouple attached to it. The hot plate should be set to a temperature near the warmest temperature in the scene. Further, adding a low temperature reference target would facilitate a two point linear calibration curve (straight line) that could be used to interpolate other temperatures from (a bowl of slushy ice water would make a good 0 degree C reference target),
Of course the test needs to be done in a controlled way with as many temperature influencing factors as possible accounted for and measured if possible. Air temperature, wind, whatever. The simple action of a person going in and installing or removing material can change the test results so it is best conducted using the in-situ reference targets and performing the experiment several times with no insulation and again later several times after the insulation has been added and after any introduced heat from a human has dissipated (may have to run an experiment to figure out how long to wait between installing/removing the insulation) At the end make a measurement again of the initial state to see if the no insulation measurements are the same before and after.
I would treat each side as a separate test (set of measurements with and without insulation) because moving the equipment between measurements can mess things up. Also other factors may influence the sides differently from each other.
As long as the test were being conducted why not use different materials ,and conduct the test several times to compare effectiveness of different materials or application techniques (e,g internal blankets or external insulation blankets)
I would very much like to see the data and results from such a set of measurements. I think they would be quite informative.
I live in Solvang, CA and if someone near me has a FLIR camera and a few thermistors with a readout device (say an Omega or HP handheld meter type device) along with a low temperature hot plate or blackbody source I would be happy to help engineer, set up and conduct such a test.
Regards,
Craig