I deleted my first remarks, driven by emotion.
-------
I would ask all WTW members to consider the risks associated when posting about relatively unknown locations.
When publishing on the internet, a single photograph, especially if accompanied with a name and/or description, can become a searchable item via google/bing . Examples would be "sierra hot spring" or "secret nevada petroglyph" or "Idaho fly fish 4x4", etc. Naming your locations is broadcasting to the world, literally.
Maybe the forum or blog you post to is for like-minded good folk, but that information can also be received by anyone; from an unwitting tourist who gives out exact GPS coords (which most phones tag to the metadata of your photos), or the local 4x4 club looking for their next annual gathering location. The backcountry is at risk of being over-published to anyone with GPS and a phone! Imagine your favorite spot going from a few vehicles to fifty rigs.
Well, you get the idea.
Even if a nice spot is somewhat known such as the Race Track, more posts with names and photos increase the visibility on search engines, resulting in population increases. Our local swimming-hole river has gone from 500k visitors to 700k in the last five years. Guess why? With 12M people within three hours, it only takes a slight uptick in the awareness to suddenly max out a local sweet spot.
Once you publish a location, that cat is out of the bag forever. There is no going back. Anyone can republish that information and you will have no control where it goes. I encourage everyone to think twice about blogging specifics about the cool places. I prefer keeping our secret spots close to the vest, shared via PM's or campfire stories, or earned through research and exploration without certain success You can still tell your story, as many here do with great relish, but consider keeping the specifics a bit vague to challenge the next explorer.