If money is no object which would you buy?

Star152

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2007
Messages
188
This is my first post and will me one of many. If cost was no object which pop up camper would be your first choice and why?

4wheel
ATC
Northstar
Hallmark
Outfitter
Alaskan
Palomino
Starcraft

Did I miss one......if so please add.
 
Welcome to the forum. Well if money is no object then a FWC of course! The others are all good campers. I'm on my second FWC so you could say I'm a satisfied customer. I like the FWC because of the light weight and the low profile. It also has a Zen simplicity that appeals to me. But the best camper is the one you like.
 
Well if light weight was an important factor for you then you only have FWC, ATC, and Outfitter as choices. I would be interested in taking a close look at the Outfitters before making that choice.
 
I think if money was REALLY no object I might consider buying the Wescott's Turtle lV. This is a custom FWC on a Ford Chassis. I think the guys from ATC might have had something to do with the building of their FWC. From all the places that camper went I'll bet the bugs where worked out of it! But right now I'm still looking for a used FWC "Ranger".:rolleyes:
 
If cost was no object which pop up camper would be your first choice and why?


..if cost were no object I would not consider any of the campers on your list. Here is my pick:
VXL16HD.3-560.jpg

What do you mean it's not a pop-up camper? .. it pops up and you go camping in it!
VXL16HD.10-560.jpg

http://www.unicat.net/en/index2-Programm.html

Cheers
Mark
 
Uh, holy crap. I want one of those Unimog thingys.

A guy here in Bend has an Earthroamer. You have to see one in person to really appreciate it.
 
Can you Say "HUGE"

I saw a EarthRoamer in Homer Alaska last August. They are HUGE!! You bet they are not made to go off road 4 wheeling. That's like owning a Cadillac Escalade and taking through the desert on the Baja 1000 course...NOT! Some creatures are for "lookin' good" some are for riding hard!:p
 
I saw a EarthRoamer in Homer Alaska last August. They are HUGE!! You bet they are not made to go off road 4 wheeling. That's like owning a Cadillac Escalade and taking through the desert on the Baja 1000 course...NOT! Some creatures are for "lookin' good" some are for riding hard!:p

Well if money were REALLY no object, I'd take one out and see what it could do :D
 
lots of money

Well if money was no object I would get a 35' motor home, a chauffeur, one blond and one brunette, for cooking and cleaning of course, you can tell I am not married, and travel the country.

Now that the fantasy if over, back to reality. Of all the campers that you listed there, if weight is not an issue, the Alaskan is the Rolls Royce of pop ups. Heavy though. Built to last for years. You see some of them from the 60's still in use.

If light weight is a concern then the FWC or ATC.

If you are going to be doing some serious off roading the others that are listed will tear themselves up in a short time.

If you are just a weekend camper that stays on the highway, stores the camper for most of the year and takes care of it, then just about any camper will work. Just a matter of what you want to have in it and who offers you those features.

Sincerely,

Ben
www.allterraincampers.com
 
I think more money doesn’t necessarily mean better :D

You need to decide on what your wants and desires are. I don’t say needs because nobody needs a camper.;)

How will you use it? Do you want to use it like a motorhome or head into the backcountry? Do you want to fourwheel? Do you want to leave it on your truck full time?
What kind of Truck do you have or will you get? Half ton or larger?
How much time will you use it?

Once you figure out how you will use it. You can decide on a pop-up type.

FWCs and ATCs are the lightest (actually flippac and wildernest toppers are lighter).
They are strong and simple. They may be better suited for a ½ ton truck and for rougher roads.

The rest of the campers are more suited to a ¾ ton or larger truck. Pretty much all other brands of pop-up campers max out a ½ ton trucks payload capacity at their dry weight. The Alaskan camper are the other end of the spectrum, they weigh a ton.

Phoenix and Litecraft campers might be the next step up in weight. And you go up from there. If you are going to go really big then you might as well not get a pop-up and just go with a hardside.

I drive a Toyota Tundra and it’s my daily driver. I don’t really want a larger truck. To me the difference between a Toyota truck and full sized trucks is like the difference between driving a sports car and driving a 1970 Cadillac. Actually, I liked my 1989 Toyota Truck better than the Tundra. I’m just weird that way.:cool:

Don’t get me wrong, we have a Z71 Suburban as well, which we towed our trailer with. I guess for me, it comes down to how big a rig you want to be tied to. I’ve had three trailers from a popup to a 23 foot hybrid and don’t really like having such a large rig to go camping.

What I used when I was convincing my wife that we should try a pop-up truck camper was to buy a used FWC because we would have no problem reselling it. It would work on my existing truck. We could try it out and see if this type of setup works for us.

That being said, if I was buying new I would probably talk to Marty and Ben at ATC.

If bigger is better, I would take a look at the Outfitter campers. I’m in Denver and have seen several of these around and they look really nice.

Keep in mind that I just got my FWC Ranger and it’s been buried in snow since I picked it up. But these are some of the things that I considered when I was trying to decide what to purchase.

Just my 2 cents. Good luck with the decision.

Here we were loaded down in California last summer - sold the trailer as soon as we got home...
 

Attachments

  • kodiak_sm.jpg
    kodiak_sm.jpg
    39.6 KB · Views: 559
Hmmmmm I've had 2 FWC in the last 15 years. I've also had a Palomino "yuck". All three of them used. I'm still of the age (64) to subscribe to the KISS doctrine of camping. Especially in Baja and the back roads of the southwest. I think if money were no object I would still stick with the ATC or FWC. Maybe just have them custom built to my specs. As I get older my priorities will probably change and I've never had the luxury of money not being an object so its a little hard to get my mind around the concept.
Jay
 
All this money is no object speculation has been fun, but I think he meant that a difference of a few thousand dollars for something like an Outfitter would be OK if it better suited his needs. I don't think he meant a difference of a few hundered thousand dollars :)
 
Well if money was no object I would get a 35' motor home, a chauffeur, one blond and one brunette, for cooking and cleaning of course, you can tell I am not married, and travel the country.


I'm assuming the chauffeur would be a redhead, Ben? Mmmmm redheads....:rolleyes:


Well if money were no object, maybe I would have something like this, for ya know, really long trips-
hugecamper.jpg



And then I would have something like this, for really big trips -
Lenlover.jpg



And then for my international/round the world trips, something like this -
70+series.jpg



All kidding aside, for the types of trips I like to take, the lightweight, low profile, pop up slide-ins like FWC and ATC are the best option. I'm not so much about the ammenities and luxuries as I am about the ability to get waaaaay back in the bush with a camper that will survive the trek.

It's an additional bonus that the FWC's seem to hold their resale value very well, allowing owners to upgrade to newer models with more options without taking it in the shorts on their older models. It seems most of the other mentioned brands, aside from the Alaskans, do not hold their value as much.
 
O.K ... I f money was no option I would probably go with a 10 ft. Alaskan CO fully loaded mounted on a new F450 reg. cab 4x4 Diesel dually with a utility service box and a ARB front bumper and warn winch. I guess I better start saving.
 
Thanks everyone for your input all of your information has been helpfull. i guess I should have asked which pop up would be the best for the money.

here is more info:
light 4 wheeling, towing a 18ft fishing boat (LUND) alum. hull and waiting for the 07 Tundra....

Although the unimog thing is giving me ideas........:eek:


thx......
 
Well Ben said it best (and no I don't mean not the blonde and brunette thing)

But how 'bout a Unimog with an Alaskan?
 

Attachments

  • Mog w Alaskan.jpg
    Mog w Alaskan.jpg
    49.9 KB · Views: 539
  • Mog.jpg
    Mog.jpg
    161.7 KB · Views: 549
2007 Tundra

The specs are out on toyota.com

The 07 Tundra is still a half ton truck. With the 5.7L engine and the double cab, the long bed has a payload of 1555 lbs. and the standard bed is rated at 1655 lbs.

I would stick with a FWC or ATC...
 
lots of money

Well with that extra info, that should narrow it down to either FWC or us. You will need go lightweight on the camper to keep the towing capacity for the boat while not dragging down the performance too much.

Of course my opinion is a bit biased considering the years I owned FWC and now with ATC.:) :)

With either of us you have a good resale value also compared to the other campers that have been mentioned.

Now it is just a choice of what you are looking for in a camper and who offers those options for you within a price range that will work for you.

Ohhh, thats right, money is no object, forget that last sentence.:p

Sincerely,

Ben
www.allterraincampers.com
 
Back
Top Bottom