Not me. I'd wait a year or two for any bugs to work out. I like Toyota, but I'd still be cautious.craig333 said:That'd make my decisions pretty tough if I was in the market for a new rig.
I bought a 2004 Titan the first year it was out and it was solid except for the front brake rotors. At 7,000 to 8,000 miles they'd warp. Had two rotor changes before Nissan got the fix right. They told me the first one was just in interim and it would happen again. Once they had the new rotor design correct, the did a complete brake job on all four wheels. Always loved Nissans. Didn't want to sell my crew cab but it just could't carry a camper.Wandering Sagebrush said:Not me. I'd wait a year or two for any bugs to work out. I like Toyota, but I'd still be cautious.
Tundra ratings are high in these reports. Are there reports with low ratings like you suggest ?Onefin said:Great engine, but wrong application.
The tundra is a low quality cheaply-made truck that deserves the cheap to build 5.7 gas that it has.
I can't imagine spending 50k on a cummins in a toyota truck.
The 2011 tundra we just sold will be our last (new-ish) toyota, would still get an old landcruiser again.
So happy the day I sold that truck.
Toyota is the new cheap car maker, low quality, tons of recalls and awful dealer service.
If they brought over their good ROTW trucks (70 series, diesel LC) they'd have been ahead of the game.
I still cannot understand why people pay so much for gas tacomas?
The old toyota reputation of good, durable, reliable vehicles is rapidly eroding, so why buy an ugly cheap plastic vehicle that isn't any more reliable or affordable than the others?