I got a FWC with the incandescent lamps and tried a few different options for LED replacement bulbs.
My main concern was to have a warm white, similar as much as possible to incandescent. I found the fluorescent and LED light option that FWC have a too harsh ("cool") white color.
I got LEDs that had been mentioned in this forum:
sensibulb
superbrightleds 1156-PCB-xWHP9
starlights 1141-250NL
To compare:
................lumens..kelvin..amps
sensibulb.......130?....2650?...0.19?
superbrightleds..92.....3100....0.19
starlights......250.....3200....0.27
incandescent....132?....?.......1.44?
Here are my tests:
https://picasaweb.google.com/101661136245789812800/LEDS?authkey=Gv1sRgCKX8yfXr2oKH_wE#5644694184772612082
(same white balance and aperture for all shots, but some shots have longer exposition time)
Subjective findings - inside:
The sensibulb has the nicest color. It's a bit surprising that so much light comes from only one LED. At the beginning it's weird to see the light come from such a small spot, but I rapidly got used to it. Now I like it as much as the incandescent one. It is the most expensive and requires a G4 to single bayonet adapter.
The superbrightleds one works well but needs to be attached to the lamp somehow. The color is "cooler". It is the cheapest.
The starlights one works well but and is noticeably brighter. The color is "cooler". It fits well inside the FWC lamp.
Subjective findings - outside:
The sensibulb works well in orange. It seems to have the widest angle of the LED ones. If you stare at it, you can see that it comes from only one LED and it's a bit awkward.
The superbrightleds one works well but needs to be attached to the lamp somehow. You see the different LEDs which is a bit awkward but not much.
The starlights one is the brightest but the angle is not great due to its shape so it doesn't look quite right outside, the orange or tranparent lens cap is not evenly lit.
I'll finish by saying that you will most likely be happy with any of these, but my preference is for the sensibulb one.
Herve
My main concern was to have a warm white, similar as much as possible to incandescent. I found the fluorescent and LED light option that FWC have a too harsh ("cool") white color.
I got LEDs that had been mentioned in this forum:
sensibulb
superbrightleds 1156-PCB-xWHP9
starlights 1141-250NL
To compare:
................lumens..kelvin..amps
sensibulb.......130?....2650?...0.19?
superbrightleds..92.....3100....0.19
starlights......250.....3200....0.27
incandescent....132?....?.......1.44?
Here are my tests:
https://picasaweb.google.com/101661136245789812800/LEDS?authkey=Gv1sRgCKX8yfXr2oKH_wE#5644694184772612082
(same white balance and aperture for all shots, but some shots have longer exposition time)
Subjective findings - inside:
The sensibulb has the nicest color. It's a bit surprising that so much light comes from only one LED. At the beginning it's weird to see the light come from such a small spot, but I rapidly got used to it. Now I like it as much as the incandescent one. It is the most expensive and requires a G4 to single bayonet adapter.
The superbrightleds one works well but needs to be attached to the lamp somehow. The color is "cooler". It is the cheapest.
The starlights one works well but and is noticeably brighter. The color is "cooler". It fits well inside the FWC lamp.
Subjective findings - outside:
The sensibulb works well in orange. It seems to have the widest angle of the LED ones. If you stare at it, you can see that it comes from only one LED and it's a bit awkward.
The superbrightleds one works well but needs to be attached to the lamp somehow. You see the different LEDs which is a bit awkward but not much.
The starlights one is the brightest but the angle is not great due to its shape so it doesn't look quite right outside, the orange or tranparent lens cap is not evenly lit.
I'll finish by saying that you will most likely be happy with any of these, but my preference is for the sensibulb one.
Herve