ntsqd
Custom User Title
I guess I'm not buying into the "alternators are battery maintainers, not chargers" thing. It is true that the regulators typically used with land vehicle mounted alternators are about a "stupid" as they get, and that may be the reason behind this assertion. That is to say that it's not the alternator's fault that it's not a 'charger' and that it is the cheap, low grade regulator that it's been saddled with that is at fault. I've been looking into how to change that, and it gets expensive pretty fast. In the marine world the alternator is a charger, not a maintainer. They use regulators made by Balmar or Sterling Power to name two (not sure of/if any others). If you click those links be ready for some sticker shock.
Then I stumbled onto the C-Tek D250S which solves the stupid alternator regulator problem (at least for the camper battery(ies)) and provides battery separation all while also working as the solar charge controller too. Though it still isn't inexpensive, it does replace at least one other component making it's purchase a more reasonable option. What we have is working, which is why we don't yet have a D250S to report about. With this unit (or one of the marine regulators) I think that the alternator can become a viable battery charger.
Our truck ('95 CTD does not have an internal alternator regulator, it is external to the alternator and is actually built into the PCM. In our truck's case, these are known to fail while the rest of the PCM continues to work as expected. This makes a marine external regulator very tempting. Except for the cost. But it would put the truck's Die Hard Platinum starting batteries under a multi-step charger instead of a simple, 'stupid' regulator.
Then I stumbled onto the C-Tek D250S which solves the stupid alternator regulator problem (at least for the camper battery(ies)) and provides battery separation all while also working as the solar charge controller too. Though it still isn't inexpensive, it does replace at least one other component making it's purchase a more reasonable option. What we have is working, which is why we don't yet have a D250S to report about. With this unit (or one of the marine regulators) I think that the alternator can become a viable battery charger.
Our truck ('95 CTD does not have an internal alternator regulator, it is external to the alternator and is actually built into the PCM. In our truck's case, these are known to fail while the rest of the PCM continues to work as expected. This makes a marine external regulator very tempting. Except for the cost. But it would put the truck's Die Hard Platinum starting batteries under a multi-step charger instead of a simple, 'stupid' regulator.