Engine braking?

I have a 1993 Dodge Ram W250 with a 1st generation Cummins diesel which has had an exhaust brake on it since around 50,000 miles. The truck has a 5-speed Getrag transmission which has worked well. The truck and engine has 400,000 miles on it. I have never had an engine problem from using the exhaust brake. I have never read of any engine problems caused by using an exhaust brake.

There are two types of engine brakes used on diesel engines - one is a "compression or engine brake" (a.k.a Jake Brake) and the other is an "exhaust brake" (e.g. PAC brake).

The compression brake, opens the exhaust valves to dump engine compression, and would not add any additional stress or heat to the exhaust. When it opens it dumps the compression from the cylinder and the cylinder does not fire so there is no added heat to exhaust. https://youtu.be/HkfjCJClWVA.

An exhaust brake is a device that essentially creates a major restriction in the exhaust system, and creates substantial exhaust back pressure to retard engine speed and offer some supplemental braking. In most cases, an exhaust brake is so effective that it can slow a heavily loaded vehicle on a downgrade without ever applying the vehicle's service brakes. Exhaust brakes are manufactured by many companies. The brakes vary in design, but essentially operate as described above. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exhaust_brake

One perspective is that since the injectors are flowing little or no fuel while the exhaust brake is in use, the engine is effectively acting as an enormous air pump, running relatively low-temperature air into the exhaust. Despite the “blockage” created by the exhaust brake, it is likely cooling the manifold because there is no combustion, especially at the higher RPMs needed for effective braking.

So an "exhaust brake" works by increasing pressure - and a "compression engine brake" works by reducing pressure.

It is my undrrstanding that diesel engines are designed to accomodate either style and you should not need to worry about engine component failure for either style.
 
From what I have seen most of the exhaust brake kits either come with the up-rated exhaust valve springs or strongly recommend their installation.
 
Thom,

You are correct that engine exhaust brakes need heavier valve springs to allow the engine to compress the "exhaust gas". My truck (with Cummins 1st gen diesel) has heavier valve springs. I still have the original valves, pistons, rings, turbo and injectors although the injectors have been rebuilt once.

The engine is still running strong and reliably at 400,000 miles. The suspension and some other parts (alternator, water pump, idler pulley) have worn to the point I am replacing things but the engine and drive train are still good. Lots of these trucks out there in hot shot service that have gone 800,000 to 1,000,000+ miles.
 
From reading the Pacbrake literature it looks like the 12V Cummins engines need the upgraded exhaust valve springs while the 24V don't. I've never had any problems with the exhaust brake on my stock 24V Cummins.
 
camelracer said:
From reading the Pacbrake literature it looks like the 12V Cummins engines need the upgraded exhaust valve springs while the 24V don't. I've never had any problems with the exhaust brake on my stock 24V Cummins.
I have a 2017 CTD. Love the exhaust brake. When I go downhill I hardly ever need to get on the brakes.
 
2006 Duramax here, with a VGT turbo. With a good tow tune, the VGT vanes are used to create an exhaust brake. LOVE it. Cruise control holds speed on most very steep hills.
 
A questioned asked of the makers of the Jake Brake:


Do you make a product for the Ford 7.3L Powerstroke or Navistar International T444E engines?

ANSWER:

No, Jacobs does not offer an exhaust or engine brake for these engines in fact, Navistar and Ford have requested that we do not develop one for these engines.
The primary concern with putting a retarder on these engines is their use of hydraulic lifters. Most engines with hydraulic lifters have fairly low exhaust back pressure limits so the performance of an exhaust brake would not be substantial. More importantly the use of an exhaust brake on an engine with hydraulic lifters can cause engine damage. The problem is that the increased back pressure resulting from the operation of the exhaust brake will cause some degree of valve float. This valve float can cause the hydraulic lifter to re-set with the valve still open (not seated). This phenomenon is known as lifter jacking. Lifter jacking could also result if a traditional engine brake were used on these engines. The results of lifter jacking can be anything from low positive power (because the valves stay open) to engine damage caused by valve to piston contact.
 

New posts - WTW

Back
Top Bottom